Back to home-page Images

Digital DV Formats
Comparison of tape formats

http://www.cinematography.net/default.htm Good tech info site
Film Stocks Camera models

A lens with focal length approx two times the diagonal of the frame on the neg (or chip) corresponds to what the eye would normally see, with minimal distortion. For 35mm movie film this is an angle of view of 50mm, for 16mm film it is 25mm. For mini DV (quarter inch chip) its around 6mm.

The physical size of the image receptor (film gate or video chip) also has a bearing on the depth of field achievable (for a given aperture), the larger the area, the shallower the depth of field that can be achieved (generally giving a more pleasing image).

In a film camera all parts of this image are exposed simultaneously (usually) at 24 frames per second.
Most video cameras, for historical reasons (to do with TV picture transmission) scan at 50 (PAL) or 60 (NTSC) fps and interleave every two images to give a 25 or 30 fps image. However the scanning is not instantanoeous and the two images that produce each frame are 1/50th second apart, so motion effects are visible (usually a combing effect on moving edges).
With the advent of DV generation cameras, faster electronics have enabled "frame mode" video, where the image is scanned once.. again not instantaneous, so motion tends to "bend" streight edges. The faster the chip is scanned the less obvious this is, but the trade off is exposure time and lack of " film-like" motion blur. Larger chip size mitigates this to some extent, as larger chip size means more light/less noise etc.. This is most obvious in the new generation of stills/video cameras (2007..) that have excellent low light capability (because of large sensor size) but "jelly roll" pans because of the time taken to scan the sensor.

IMAX 65mm neg moving through the gate horizontally
Back to home-page image size 71.09mm x 52.63mm

65mm neg moving through the gate vertically
Back to home-page image size approx 50mm x 27mm (aspect ratio a natural 1.85:1)

35mm stills camera (standard gauge) neg moves through the gate horizontally (not a movie size!)
Back to home-page image size 32mm x 24mm (40mm diagonal) (aspect ratio a natural 4x3)

35mm stills camera half-frame (standard gauge) neg moves through the gate vertically, similar to movie film.
Back to home-page image size 24mm x 18mm (30 mm diagonal) ????? (aspect ratio a natural 4x3)

DX stills camera (eg nikon digital camera, D40, D50,D70 etc)
Back to home-page image size 24mm x 16mm (28.85 mm diagonal, so this is 4x2.67 rather than 4x3, or 16x10.67 rather than 16x9)

Four Thirds stills/video cameras (eg Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1, Olympus E-P1)
Back to home-page 18 x 13.5 mm Four Thirds & micro four thirds system use the same sensor size (3x4)

35mm movie (standard gauge) neg moves through the gate vertically
Back to home-page image size 24mm x 18mm (4:3, open gate, usually quoted: 27.26mm diagonal)
Back to home-page 22 x 9.5 ( 2:1 mask, technoscope)
Back to home-page 21 x 11 ( 1.85:1 mask )

Back to home-page Super16 image size approx 12mm x 7.2mm. (14.55mm diagonal) (aspect ratio 1:1.67 = 15x9 (crop the top and bottom a little to get 16x9)

(aside: with Kodak Vision 2 100T (7212 introduced in 2005) filmstock it is possible to exceed the resolution of uncompressed 1080p HD D-5 video video with Super 16.)

16mm movie (standard gauge) neg moves through the gate vertically
Back to home-page image size approx 9mm x 6.5mm. (aspect ratio 3x4) pretty well now an obsolete format.

Back to home-page 2/3" video, eg top end Hi-Def, digibeta etc (11 mm diagonal) see focal length comparrisons

Back to home-page Video 1/3" CCD chip: (eg PD150 etc, (5.5 mm diagonal))
Back to home-page Video 1/4" CCD chip: (a tad under 5mm x 3.5mm)

_________________________________________________

70mm super 16 not quite to scale!!

 

_________________________________________________

Focal length v image comparison Hi-Def / 35mm / super 16mm
how to use this: a 5mm hi-def lens will give the same image (or angle of view) as 6.6mm super 16mm film lens:

Lens 2/3" HD-EC 11mm diag 35mm Academy (27.26mm diag) Super 16 (14.55mm diag)
Fjs5 5mm 12.4mm 6.6mm
Fjs9 9mm 22.3mm 11.9mm
Fjs14 14mm 34.7mm 18.5mm
Fjs24 24mm 59.5mm 31.7mm
Fjs35 35mm 86.7mm 46.3mm
Fjs55 55mm 136.3mm 72.8mm
Hj8x 4.78 KLL-SC 5.5 - 44mm 13.6 - 109mm 7.3 - 58.2mm
Hj11x 5.58 KLL-SC 4.7 - 52mm 11.6 - 128mm 6.2 - 68.8mm
Hj21x 7.58 KLL-SC 7.5 - 157mm 18.6 - 391.6mm 9.9 - 209mm

 

35mm stills lenses on 1/3" chip cameras (XL1, XL2 etc)
Without any additional glass or "depth of field" adaptors like the PS techik, the "equivalent" focal length is 7.2x the rated focal length. ie a 50mm stills lens on the video camera gives the same angle of view as a 360mm lens on a 35mm stills camera!!. Telephotos are rendered virtually unusable, and wide lenses impossible to achive...
(based on the ratio of the image height behind the lens, or the diagonal in mm, 5.5mm:40mm ).


An anamorphic adaptor, to convert a 3x4 image to 16x9, increases the width of the image by 1/3rd, for the same camera lens, whilst keeping the height the same.
(Not to be confused with a streight wide angle adaptor, which are marked with a conversion factor, usually 0.7 or 0.4).)

So it in effect reduces the focal length horizontally of the camera's lens by 1/4 (just multiply by 0.75).

lens focal length effective focal length with anamorphic adaptor
5.5mm 4.125mm
9mm 6.75mm
12mm 9mm
100mm 75mm


note the slight skew induced by the anamorphic adaptor (camera position for the two pictures is identical), because, in this case the adapter was deliberately rotated to make the window sides appear vertical..... (ed: interesting... so you can use an anamorphic adapter to give the illusion you have moved the camera, every camera crew should have one.... :)

 

Focal length v image comparison miniDV
miniDV 5.5mm lens give the same object size on the screen as 12mm lens (16mm Movie) as 25mm lens (35mm Movie) as 40mm lens (35mm Still camera)

Links:

IMAX
format history pages

Back to site map | top of page